Health in FocusVolunteer portal
Explore roles
Transparent selection

Clear criteria. Human decisions. Respectful communication.

A strong candidate experience does not require everyone to be successful. It requires applicants to understand how decisions are made and what happens next.

Standard applications

From interest to induction.

Some roles need fewer stages. The role page should always explain which steps apply and the expected timeline.

  1. 01

    Explore the role

    Check the need, commitment, criteria and support.

  2. 02

    Create or update your profile

    Reuse core details without repeating yourself.

  3. 03

    Submit a tailored application

    Respond to the published role criteria.

  4. 04

    Eligibility and completeness review

    A human checks basic requirements and missing information.

  5. 05

    Structured assessment

    Reviewers map evidence to published criteria.

  6. 06

    Interview or practical assessment

    Used only when it helps assess role-relevant capability.

  7. 07

    Relevant checks

    References, credentials or safeguarding checks occur only when needed.

  8. 08

    Outcome

    Receive a clear result and next steps.

  9. 09

    Induction and onboarding

    Complete role-specific conduct, safety and training requirements.

International programs

A higher readiness threshold.

Travel-based programs require additional assessment because local partnership, scope of practice, safeguarding, health, logistics and wellbeing risks must all be addressed before participation.

Ethical international engagement
  1. 1Expression of interest
  2. 2Eligibility and suitability review
  3. 3Individual interview
  4. 4Group-based assessment
  5. 5Reference, credential and safeguarding checks
  6. 6Conditional offer
  7. 7Pre-departure training and readiness review
  8. 8Final participation confirmation

Published criteria

Assessors use role-specific essential and desirable criteria, evidence locations and anchored ratings. “Culture fit” is not a criterion.

More than one reviewer

Senior, international and safeguarding-sensitive roles require at least two reviewers and documented conflict-of-interest declarations.

Status in human language

Applicants see “being reviewed”, “interview invited” or “outcome being finalised”—never opaque scores or algorithmic rejection labels.

Responsible AI notice

AI can assist administration. It cannot choose volunteers.

Applicants can ask how AI was used, correct information and request a human review of any AI-supported recommendation.

AI may

  • Summarise supplied information
  • Flag missing fields
  • Map evidence to published criteria
  • Draft role-relevant interview questions
  • Produce de-identified analytics

AI must not

  • Automatically reject or make the final decision
  • Infer personality, health or protected characteristics
  • Analyse photographs or social media profiles
  • Penalise non-native English
  • Rank applicants using opaque criteria
Ready to explore?

Every role begins with a published need.

View opportunities